InMotion® ARM for Neurological Rehabilitation

Robotic Assisted Shoulder & Elbow Therapy for Impairments from:

  • Stroke

  • Spinal Cord Injury

  • Multiple Sclerosis

  • Parkinson's Disease

  • Cerebral Palsy

  • and Other Neurological Conditions or Injuries


Have a Question?Request a Demo

Power Chair - Fully Isolated

Rehabilitation Institutes Talk about their Experiences with the InMotion® Arm

    About Saint Luke's Neurorehabilitation Institute                              About Tallahassee Memorial Rehabilitation Center                            TLC is Now Moody Neurorehabilitation Institute   


InMotion® Arm - a New Generation!

InMotion® Interactive Therapy enables clinicians to efficiently deliver intensive motor therapy to help patients regain motor function following a neurological condition or injury.  This new generation InMotion ARM® is an evidence-based neurorehabilitation technology that provides patients with real-time Assistance-as-Needed™. The InMotion ARM® quietly monitors the patient’s movements during therapy while it gently assists where needed to help them complete various motor therapy activities.

The InMotion® Robots are used for neurorehabilitation in over 20 countries, including the United States. Extensive research has shown InMotion® robots to be effective for wide range of motor impairments including: Stroke, Cerebral Palsy, Spinal Cord Injury, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease, hemiplegic shoulder pain and muscle spasticity.

For more information, or to schedule an on-site demonstration of the New Generation InMotion ARM®, please email us at or call our U.S. office at (617) 926-4800. 

Want to talk to a Clinical Specalist? Click here!Request a Demo

InMotion® Arm is here to help!

  • Task-specific training
  • No active patient movement required
  • Fast and efficient setup
  • Easy-to-Learn / Easy-to-Use
  • Evidence-based treatment protocols
  • Over 1,000 movements per session

Designed for Efficiency

  • 40% smaller footprint than the previous generation InMotion ARM®
  • Wireless report printing – no cables crossing the floor!
  • Easy patient start-up, easy to clean and easy to shut-down when done for the day
Standing - Fully Isolated - Web


Neurorehabilitation Simplified

Tailor motor therapy to the patient’s needs with adaptive therapy protocols and easy-to-use InMotion® Software:

  • Simple menus
  • Streamlined workflow
  • Easy report generation

Simple Menu Options
Simple Menu Options

Looking for more info?  Click Here!Request a Demo

InMotion® Arm Therapy Tasks

Intensive — 1024 potential movements per therapy session with evidence-based treatment protocols.

Flexible — Therapy protocols allowing clinicians to customize treatment.

Therapeutic exercise for:

  • Motor planning
  • Eye-hand coordination
  • Attention, visual field deficits/neglect
  • Massed practice
BIONIK's modular, “gym-of-robots” systems approach to neurorehabilitation is the only system designed to optimize the use of robotics for neurorehabilitation in a manner that is consistent with the latest clinical research and neuroscience, taking into account the latest understandings on motor learning interference and motor memory consolidation. For instance, training planar and vertical (anti-gravity) movements in alternate days leads to better outcomes than training during the same session2.
By measuring patient kinematic and kinetic data objectively, BIONIK's InMotion® Robots have shown that for severe to moderate brain injury the effectiveness of therapy is optimized by allowing the robots to focus on reducing impairment and allowing the therapist to assist on translating the gains in impairment into function. 

Therapy Activities - Fresh Titles



* Bosecker Caittlyn MS, Dipietro Laura, Volpe BT,  Krebs HI “Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24(1) 62-69 , 2010.

1 Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology.  Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. 1999;53:1874 –1876.

2 Krebs, H.I., et al., “Rehabilitation Robotics: Pilot Trial of a Spatial Extension for MIT-MANUS,” Journal of NeruoEngineering and Rehabilitation, Biomedcentral, 1:5 (2004)

Klein Julius, Spencer Steven J,Reinkensmeyer David J. “Breaking It Down Is Better: Haptic Decomposition of Complex Movements Aids in Robot-Assisted Motor Learning” ieee Transactions On Neural Systems And Rehabilitation Engineering, VOL. 20, NO. 3, MAY 2012

Krakauer John W, Carmichael Thomas S, Corbett Dale, Wittenberg George F, “Getting neurorehabilitation right: What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, published online March 30 2012

Dipietro, H.I. Krebs, B.T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, S.T. Mernoff, S.E. Fasoli, and N. Hogan “Learning, not Adaptation, Characterizes Stroke Motor Recovery: Evidence from Kinematic Changes Induced by Robot-Assisted Therapy in Trained and Untrained Task in the Same Workspace.” IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering 2012 Jan:20(1):48-57